http://climatesafety.org/misrepresenting-public-opinion/ In case of emergency... Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:01:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc http://climatesafety.org/misrepresenting-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-214 Money, money, money? » Climate Safety Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:39:50 +0000 http://climatesafety.org/?p=337#comment-214 [...] these pages, Tim Holmes has already questioned some of the methodological assumptions of the study, and the [...] [...] these pages, Tim Holmes has already questioned some of the methodological assumptions of the study, and the [...]

]]> http://climatesafety.org/misrepresenting-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-44 james holland Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:19:38 +0000 http://climatesafety.org/?p=337#comment-44 although i agree that reporting of these kinds of things is problematic, i also believe that the IPPR report has uncovered a truth which people concerned about stopping climate change must address. Despite an abundance of information and evidence of impending doom, many, or even most people are just not doing anything, and are not likely to. is there something about climate change that is fundamentally unmotivating? i think there might be. although i agree that reporting of these kinds of things is problematic, i also believe that the IPPR report has uncovered a truth which people concerned about stopping climate change must address. Despite an abundance of information and evidence of impending doom, many, or even most people are just not doing anything, and are not likely to. is there something about climate change that is fundamentally unmotivating? i think there might be.

]]> http://climatesafety.org/misrepresenting-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-43 Clive Hamilton Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:14:38 +0000 http://climatesafety.org/?p=337#comment-43 Thank goodness someone has exposed IPPR's deeply deceptive report. The writing up of the results violated basic principles of good social research and one can only wonder why IPPR would so damage its credibility by this sort of media whoring. Thank goodness someone has exposed IPPR’s deeply deceptive report. The writing up of the results violated basic principles of good social research and one can only wonder why IPPR would so damage its credibility by this sort of media whoring.

]]> http://climatesafety.org/misrepresenting-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-41 Diana Korchien Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:32:58 +0000 http://climatesafety.org/?p=337#comment-41 I am speechless! Why only interview a total of 38 people and present the finding as representative of the nation? This report smells absolutely rotten to me. If a new medicine were being trialled, there would have been a far greater number of human guinea pigs involved - and even then the safety of that medicine is not guaranteed. Our climate is in very unsafe hands. I am speechless! Why only interview a total of 38 people and present the finding as representative of the nation? This report smells absolutely rotten to me. If a new medicine were being trialled, there would have been a far greater number of human guinea pigs involved – and even then the safety of that medicine is not guaranteed. Our climate is in very unsafe hands.

]]> http://climatesafety.org/misrepresenting-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-36 Tweets that mention Misrepresenting Public Opinion? | Climate Safety -- Topsy.com Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:44:47 +0000 http://climatesafety.org/?p=337#comment-36 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Warren Pearce. Warren Pearce said: Reporting of the @IPPR #climatechange attitudes survey gets a good going over http://bit.ly/bHwee (via @bengoldacre) [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Warren Pearce. Warren Pearce said: Reporting of the @IPPR #climatechange attitudes survey gets a good going over http://bit.ly/bHwee (via @bengoldacre) [...]

]]>